Thread: The Great Pumpkin

Gnarly, dude!

Yay! My very own guy started a ribbon! I am all over this one.

Thanks for your service, people!!!
k

Have at it! It will be achievement filled I am sure. SUBSCRIBED

Originally Posted by ;

Have at it! It is going to be achievement filled I'm positive. SUBSCRIBED

Cheers, Baillie!
k

This thread appears somewhat like a brain storming session where new ideas will be introduced , tested and implemented.
Lets see where this goes.

Improved Bollinger Bands indior.

Inside this remark PipMeUp discusses issues with the typical execution of the Bands indior.

His objections are:
1) The amount of samples for the deviation must be typically much bigger than the one for the MA. This implementation allows this, as the amounts can be specified by you separately.
2) The lag of the simple moving average is half of its period. If we subtract the moving average at position [I] in the price at Nighttime [I] to obtain the standard deviation from another measure, we're making a mistake, because the moving average due to the lag corresponds to the price half a period past. So what one should do would be to subtract the moving average at position [I] in the price [I MA_period/two]. This is fixed here.

Https://www.nigeriaforextrading.com/...1444469796.mq4



The Typical tricks (mixing two timeframes to exchange pullbacks):

Register Sir..
MTH

Originally Posted by ;

Subscribe Sir.. MTH

This ought to work particularly well on the range bar chart, likely comparable on the Renko etc..
k

Originally Posted by ;

Improved Bollinger Bands indior. In this remark PipMeUp discusses problems with the implementation of the Bands indior. His objections are: 1) The number of samples to the deviation should be typically much larger than the one for the MA. This implementation makes it possible for this, because you can specify the amounts separately. 2) The consequences of this simple moving average is half of its time. If we subtract the moving average at stake from the price at candle ...

Hey K,

Are you able to explain this a little more - looks very intriguing and I'd love to examine it with my ZZBB technique.

Cheers

V