How many of Technical Analysis based systems are junk? - Page 3
Page 3 of 617 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 68

Thread: How many of Technical Analysis based systems are junk?

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    ...

    Give a Ferrari to a apprentice, he will run in the wall pretty quickly. Give it to Schumacher and see the gap
    STOP! STOP ! STOP

    Ralf ramped it TWICE !! Don't tell me Ralf Schmacher is a apprentice!!

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    only a fool whoud dismiss the economic news.
    ??

    I figure I know a lot of fools

  3. #23
    Majority of traders utilize indiors, in a evergoing cycle of fine tuning, combining, hunting. Majority of traders loose. Can anybody see a connection?

  4. #24
    Only a fool whoud dismiss the economic news.

    That might be overly radicaly sad. As news they give one perspective to look the way that it reflects on technical behavour.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    only a fool whoud ignore the economic news.

    Which may be overly radicaly sad. As news they give you one perspective to look how it reflects on technical behavour.
    I remember one night, sitting before my Laptop, waiting for a Interest Rate statement from Japan. It's a tentative report, so nobody knows when it is going to come out. So we've got all these traders with itchy trigger fingers. My audio news feed suddently went : Japan won't increase interest rates. I bought USD/JPY, created a few pips, and a few seconds later another audio: Correction, Japan MIGHT not increase interest rates. It's moments like these if you truly see the individual element of the market. It was quite an adventure making money on that Non-news.

    When you speak about technical behavour, it is not really technical, at a TA kind of awareness. It's more phycological, which can be less scientific. There is a big difference.

    Best regards,

    Vlad Zapletin

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    When you speak about technical behavour, it's not really technical, in a TA type of sense. It's more phycological, and it can be less scientific. There's a big difference.
    I'm not sure eanymore what's what. It goes really Dark regions of horisont in regards to Randomness and Chaos. Individuals observing and starting to examine it.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Do not forget, 10-20 years ago almost nobody employed TA. Individuals still made and lost cash in rather similar manners. TA is new hype thought imho.

    Best regards,

    Vlad
    I take acception for your inscolance you young whippersnapper.

    TA is New is News to Me.

    Hey. It's all great.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I am not sure eanymore what is what. It goes really Dark regions of horisont when it comes to Randomness and Chaos. People still observing and starting to examine it.
    Chaos, that is an interesting subject. It appears quite reasonable that a lot of the moment, market is disorderly in the scientific sense of the word. Yet, there are clearly instances, even when market is behaving in much easier ways. In each market, there are times when it is potential to create abnormal yields, multiplying after news events, and this is well documented. Rather then trading insanity, it seems like a much better idea to exchange inefficiencies and irregularities.

    Best regards,

    Vlad

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    Chaos, that's an intriguing subject. It appears quite reasonable that a lot of the moment, market is chaotic in the scientific sense of the term. Yet, there are clearly times, when market is behaving in much easier ways. In every market, there are times when it's possible to create abnormal returns, e.g following news events, and this is well documented. Instead of trading chaos, it looks like a better idea to exchange inefficiencies and irregularities.
    When dividing that chaos of noise in small fragments of space and time. Observing the market as 3 dimensional view. Every move can be confirmed tru thos fragments. Focusing only in small fragment of market movement. And how it acts in that current fragment of time.

    It won't tell what's going to occure next but it inform the charasteristic similaryties what market contains. Out come of this fragment is never the same. But there's similarityes in behavour.

  10. #30
    I will jump in and say, most do not understand what is going on at the first place, and what concepts will get the job done. . Plus they throw indiors on, and so you add what you do not know onto what you do not know, and you're expecting profit from this. . hmm...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.