MBTrading could have been the best broker - Page 3
Page 3 of 613 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: MBTrading could have been the best broker

  1. #21
    There live is much better then there demonion,

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by ;
    I am in the midst of searching for an ecn broker for the new egy. I thought MBT could have fulfilled my standards but it did not, that is a pity. The drawbacks are as follows:

    Disadvantages:
    The platform is too cluttered, especially with all these floating windows.

    Improvements:
    Display buy/sell on window.
    Option to show separate transactions of the same instrument on place window, and display the full price rather than the aggregate foundation.
    Grouping of open orders.
    Better charting capacity.

    Other than that, I believe that the platform is good, especially with all...
    I presume you are talking about the Nav and not MetaTrader? I utilize Meta through these for a few things and Nav for others. Nav is much more customizable. I enjoy the floating windows because I will lay out my display however I want. Better charting is fine, but that is what Nav Pro is going to be around. In terms of the separate trades item, that is a function of an ECN and not a desk. As you desired an ECN, you can not get around that (should be a hint if a broker says they are ECN but does not aggregate). Execution stone though, and the Nav order forms are spectacular.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.