Originally Posted by
;
Hull's Moving Average, averaged with Moving Average = HMAMA..
So I've got HMAMA going, and that I kind of like it. It is not sticky like HMA, but it's not so laggy like MA.
HMAMA= (HMA MA) / two
Why HMAMA is successful:
One of the problems with MA crossover approaches is the MA's actually lag. And when you've got a motion, you get the reverse. . And get thrown around across the line. HMA goes quickly and moves easily, and so HMA does not have exactly the same issue. However, HMA moves quickly and sticks IMHO for it to be a powerful xover indior. It has a tendency to overshoot about the moves. . MA does not.
So when you combine both, you seem to get the best features of both. . (or maybe you'll wind up with the worst characteristics of the two, not sure yet).
But so much, I LIKE IT.
When I exchanged it like a regular MA xover. . It appears to work. .
I believe an entry sign to be when the body of an whole bar has crossed within the HMAMA. Exactly the same, the exit sign.
HMAMA 34 about the 1 Day charts appears to work beautifully.