My transactions can last from moments in time to hours. The programme may enter transactions instantly, but I never hold over. The programme is based on amounts which are recalibrated at the e.o.d.
Originally Posted by ;
My transactions can last from moments in time to hours. The programme may enter transactions instantly, but I never hold over. The programme is based on amounts which are recalibrated at the e.o.d.
Originally Posted by ;
I concur with you based on your weight-loss fitting the market price . That would mean investing with lot dimensions in relation to where your stop would be best put.Originally Posted by ;
I think a trader should be concentrated on how much they can lose compared to how much they can win just to keep the ego intact.
My calculated cease loss is only astrophic. The actual stop is based on my trading system. My easiest definition is that I exchange intraday swings, in which my second entry is my departure. Not always the case, but it is the design. That's precisely why my cease never gets struck unless I lose power or my Internet connection. That's why I can arrange my risk the way I do. I focus on winning, not losing. A loss means a change in management, or I have stuck in some kind of consolidation which I need to get out of, lol.Originally Posted by ;
Lol of course I focus on winning but I'm also very aware of just how much I can lose because some ppl appear to forget that drawdown is a part of trading. Like imagine being capable of the pic I submitted. Thats a 100k account which isn't peanuts for a millionaire trader. So in my head I know what my loss would look like but my purpose is to not need to see this loss.Originally Posted by ;
Hmm, I/we don#8217;t obsess on the percent breakdown of winners .
Here#8217;s a link to some useful site and an article covering one metric such as Sharpe ratio along with its advantages and disadvantages. Might be worth you bookmarking this simple site.
Https://www.quantstart.com/articles/...ce-Measurement
Here#8217;s another simple site which is in reality the one possessed by FXCM. Fwiw and imho, this is where the retail industry is headed. Learn to code, even if it#8217;s MQL, and basic python.
https://www.quantnews.com/?utm_campa..._source=Eloqua
Originally Posted by ;
I was thinking about precisely the same thing the other day. Risk is different depending on how you measure it. Two hedge funds could have the same yield, but depending on what grade they are in contrast to, they will have different alpha.Originally Posted by ;
Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing!
Bookmark both sites and at coffee/tea breaks quietly work your way through the articles and content. Worth doing as this is the area where retail is led. The only consistently profitable retailers that I know know also how to code, they employ automated s, they obsess over issues such as speed of execution, low latency, miniature spreads, etc.. There's a financial technology revolution been going on, that the senior school retail traders on here have seen pass them . Get with it.
Originally Posted by ;
Yes im a complete time betfair trader.Originally Posted by ;
Same applies.
The pros use bots.