Have you considered using volume to validate those points? Sometimes the price share alone does not show the whole story.
Printable View
Have you considered using volume to validate those points? Sometimes the price share alone does not show the whole story.
Good point. I tried volume but in the end it distracted me more than help me. I prefer to keep it simple and trust the areas.
I respect your approach, but if you ignore the volume, you're leaving out an important layer of analysis.
It could be. Everyone finds what works for them. I had doubts about the volume. I am calmer reading structure and clean areas.
Of course, if you already have a system that gives results, there is no reason to complicate itself. But it is always good to review new tools.
Have you ever considered using harmonic patterns along with your QM and S/D? They could give you even more accurate entries.
I tried them for a while but it was hard to see them in real motion. I keep what I can quickly identify without having to draw half geometry on the chart.
I don't blame you, some graphics seem to be due to Da Vinci with so many scribbles, better clarity than confusion.
A well-placed line is worth more than ten contradictory indicators.
Your approach reminds me of Al Brooks. Have you read it?