Thank you this is what I had been attempting to say. But most here asume because theres a risk of loss its classified a bet.Originally Posted by ;
Thank you this is what I had been attempting to say. But most here asume because theres a risk of loss its classified a bet.
Yea I don't know it badly only depends on what your definition of gamble is right?
I'd say just because your risking something, does not mean you're gambling.
I know, this really is too deep guy. I do not need to look at my body as some type of muddled mql code up.
I bet we'd get some mql in our dna as well.
Shit, I better quit!
Hey Aussie! You are far too sensitive. No wonder you knew what SwissRaj was on about. It is gambling. Get over it. There's not any shame attached - not for me.
The underarm bowl was not actually bowling either but it had been regarded as a sort of bowling.
Perhaps you prefer the word speculation.
Investopedia clarifies Speculation
Speculation should not be considered purely a kind of gambling, as speculators do make an educated choice before opting to get the extra risks. Speculation can't be egorized as a conventional investment since the obtained risk is higher than average.
So that it is not purely gambling but it's still gambling. What a breakthrough.
.
HAHA - Hm being from Tonga I'm no sure who you were refering to. I'm not only patianate . I'm sorry I will never call it gambling. You get it over. , about this, I'm affaid we'll never agree but enjoy Spekitox it doesnt matter what you call it we all want the identical thing I guess... But I respect your opinion and do see where you are coming from.
Hey don't bring Swiss raj in this!
Um as soon as you've compounded far enough you cant just open as many lots as you want - first you need liquidity which will differ in each circumstance, its a whole different game.
Well then horse racing should not be considered gambling. You're able to earn an educated decision about the horse's recent form, how many races it's won, what monitor requirements the horse likes, what the track conditions actually have been on the day and you can even go and check the horse out before the race....
But I know what you mean. When I first became interested in forex a man explained it was gambling and I thought no, it isn't, it's not like shoving $200 down the pokie machine slot never to be seen again. With forex, with enough patience and correct money management, an idea of technicals and fundies, losing trades do not always need to be shut in loss.
But it's still betting, whichever way you look at it thought Tonga was a joke.... Isn't it?
.
Hey, would it be called betting if you can find riskless chances? Arbing per se...
That brings up another issue, IMO.
Because say there was a wonderful trader who was amazing and never lost. Only a machine. He is risking money to generate money but has a success rate of 100%.
But would you bet your home and spouse on the next trade? No, since there is a element of risk of the trade, no matter how certain he is of this outcome.
Once the outcome is preset, however, that's the purpose of arbing. . It's totally different. There's nothing that can fail once it's began.
Because say there was a wonderful trader who was awesome and never lost. A machine. He is risking money to make money but has a success rate of 100%.
But would you bet your home and partner on the next trade? No, since there is still a very small element of risk of the trade that is next it would be gambling.
When the end result is preset, however, which is the purpose of arbing. . It is completely different. There. So the small ROI is maximised as much as you can, in fact arbing's purpose is using as much money as possible.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote