Fantastic Spud. I set up this last night. It is in fact not difficult to study and understand. Super-visual. I'm really hepped-up with this one. Thanks.
Fantastic Spud. I set up this last night. It is in fact not difficult to study and understand. Super-visual. I'm really hepped-up with this one. Thanks.
Great! I was afraid it could confuse the hell out of people.Originally Posted by ;
Spudfyre.... This really is excellent... and funnyOriginally Posted by ;
this... mixed with elasticity... will be a great good method.
And... I believe the LTFS lines along with the UTFS lines can be very helpful to ascertain elasticity... on your chart... LTFS were moving down... but each of the red lines... were glued into the crimson wall 14,3,3... so. . This might be a sign of elasticity. . And then search price movement to affirm... and include more lots from the very first sign of LTFS change of leadership.
Thank you for sharing these thoughts Spud
I'm just getting started with this one....you are thinking ahead. . .which is great Lots more to come and a whole bunch of egies that fit with with MTF Stochastics we already know. But I'm glad you are already seeing how to unite the tools!Originally Posted by ;
I'm interested in elasticity to detect continuation of trends.... But I have seen that.... This template can be used also in numerous frames so it may be utilised in Daily or even weekley charts to detect long trends... and H1 to fine tune entries.... And depart only when the large timeframe tells to exit. It would be like having a MTF*MTF stochs. The ability of multi-time-frame stochs... by two.Originally Posted by ;
Thanks for all of the work which you're placing in spud (is spud any reference to sausage?) .
Just a few questions if you do not mind. Primarily, are we entering the 80/20 crossover? Secondly, is this technique a substitute for the first four chart system (15m, 30m, 1H and 4H)?
Another thing I want to ask is how do you have exchanged the anomaly from the enclosed 4H gbpjpy chart at which blue stochs go entirely around the outside without messing up? Would you have continued the trade with a massive drawdown or exited somewhere. Or is this just a bad luck move?
regards
Mike
is derived from Spitfire. . .when I joined the Internet many many years back my nic was Spitfire where I had been....of course as the Web grew, Spitfire was well utilized and so it turned out (something nobody would pick). I'm a Spitfire enthusiast (it is a plane for all those not into historical aviation).Originally Posted by ;
Think of everything introduced by me as a tool. Nothing replaces anything, all the tools are made to help and be chosen to optimize our trading. We all will prefer some resources better than many others and use them longer. But, all the resources do use the same foundation that is explained early on in MTF Stochastics.
You are getting a littel before me as I'm just starting with the basics of threads. But from what we understand so far I will explain the chart you posted.
The first short entry is really basic with the LTFS (blue) on the inside wall and falling. The exit has two options. Utilize the LTFS inside wall ruler or await the 1H 14,3,3 stoch (not shown) to cross back over 20. For the interest of keeping constant with thread theory we are out when the LTFS crossed the wallsocket.
The second entry is a loser. We'd have ceased out based only on what we understand of the thread theory up to now. But, give me time and I will show us how to work around that one.
The next entry is again basic and also the exit direct us into a break even point beneath thread theory alone. Again, we've got tools in MTF Stochastics that will help us and one is following the 1H stochastic (14,3,3) until it recrosses the 76.4 level.
Again, this really is ahead of where we are, so bear with me as I get all the information out there.
Hey Spud,
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP....
http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/types/uk...I/spitfire.jpg