Honestly, your questions are too general to give you specific answers.What type of system do you use?Is it manual, automated, hybrid?Without these details, we are talking in the air.In addition, evaluating a system is not just a matter of numbers.It also matters how it fits your personality as a trader.Not all systems are for everyone.
I think you should focus on consistency rather than spectacular results.A system that generates small constant profits is much more reliable than one that promises great yields but with high volatility.In addition, be sure to try the system in real time and not only in backtesting.Many strategies work on paper, but they fail in the real market due to factors such as landslides or imperfect execution.
Do you really need two years of backtesting to trust a system?If after three months you do not see consistent results in real time, the system is probably not as good as you think.Try more in demo and less in historical.The markets change fast, and what worked two years ago may not be relevant today.
A good system should be flexible enough to adjust to current market conditions.Do not obsess that it works in all possible situations because that does not exist.Instead of seeking perfection, look for systems that are solid in the conditions that are most aligned with your trading style.It is more realistic and attainable.
What you say about automated systems is certain to some extent.But remember that not all large traders are focused on "destroying" popular strategies.However, it is always better to maintain a low profile with your system.If it becomes too obvious, even small traders can negatively affect it by overtaking it.
The amount of operations does not guarantee the effectiveness of a system.A system that makes a thousand operations a year can be less profitable than one who makes 50, depending on the market conditions and the quality of the signals.Focus in key metrics such as the risk-benefit ratio and the percentage of winning operations.These are better indicators of real effectiveness.
If you really want to evaluate a system, do not stay alone with backtesting.Forward Testing (real -time tests
A 10% drawdown can be acceptable to some traders, but unacceptable to others.It all depends on how much you are willing to risk to obtain your profits.What matters more is how you handle losses.A good system should not only minimize drawdown, but also help you recover quickly when things are not going well.
Your approach to trading amounts and volumes makes sense.Large operators do not look at how many people use a system, but how much money is at stake.Therefore, very popular systems that handle large amounts can be less effective over time.But if you are operating at a smaller level, you probably don't be your goal.
At the end of the day, no system will be effective if you do not have the discipline to follow it.Many traders leave a system too soon because they do not get immediate results.An effective system not only depends on metrics, but also on your ability to trust it and apply it consistently over time.Invest 50 more answers for this forum thread between
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote