It seems that many people here do not respect Gann, but their methods have existed for decades for a reason: they work if you know how to apply them.The problem is that most traders do not have patience to understand them and frustrate before seeing results.
Perhaps the problem is not patience, but Gann is more an art than a science.It is not easy to quantify or automate, which can be frustrating for some.That said, if you find that your approach resonates with you, move on.Not all methods are for everyone.
I have been testing Gann time levels and, although they are not always 100%precise, they help identify potential inflection points in the market.If you combine them with traditional technical analysis, such as supports and resistances, they can be a very powerful tool.
Potential inflection points?That sounds like any other trading tool that depends more on luck than precision.Do not be misunderstood, Gann has its merit, but sometimes it seems that people make it something mystical instead of a logical strategy.
Gann's real secret is not at his angles or levels, but in how he combines price and time.When you find synchrony between them, you can predict significant movements.However, getting to that point requires more practice than theory.Learn by observing historical graphics and marking the cycles yourself.
All this sounds great in theory, but do you really think that something like time can predict future movements?In my experience, markets are too random for something as structured as Gann.I prefer more direct and proven strategies.
You don't have to believe in predictions to use Gann.Its levels and angles are only tools to interpret the market, not glass balls.If you combine them with fundamental and technical data, you can greatly improve your chances of success.
It is curious that you talk about probabilities.That is exactly what any other strategy does in trading, so what makes Gann special?In the end, everything is reduced to which tools make you feel more comfortable operating.If you win it is for you, use it.If not, keep going.
I have noticed that Gann's time cycles often coincide with great news events.Maybe it's a coincidence, but it's something worth exploring.For example, if you have an important cycle aligned with a Central Bank meeting, it could indicate a significant change in the price.
That sounds interesting, but I can't help thinking that you are seeing patterns where there are no.News events are unpredictable.Using something like gann to anticipate news movements seems too risky.But if you work for you, go ahead.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote